Madras High Court sets aside the ROC’s order for disqualifying Private Directors.
Madras High Court sets aside the ROC’s order for disqualifying
Private Directors.
Context : Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 sated that
Directors of Company will disqualify if Company has not filed financial
statements or annual returns for any continuous period of 3 Financial Years.
Section 164 enforced with
effect from 01.04.2014
Matters:
The Madras High Court has set
aside the disqualification of directors of private companies by the Registrar
of Companies for non-filing of financial statements for a period of three continuous financial years.
The directors were disqualified
under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The court said that since Section 164 came into effect from April 1, 2014, the
respondents(ROC) cannot disqualify the petitioners for the financial years
2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, as it would tantamount to giving retrospective
effect.
The Section says that if the
financial statements are not filed for three continuous financial years, then
the director can be disqualified. However, if Section 2(41), which defines
‘financial year’ is taken into account, then the first financial year would end
on 31.3.2015, the second financial year on 31.3.2016 and the third on
31.3.2017.
Principle of Natural justice
Petitioners had contended that
even though the Section did not contemplate a show-cause notice before taking
any action, since the disqualification had civil consequences, the principle of
natural justice had to be adhered to.
Benami
Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
Context: The
prosecution of accused persons in almost 100 confirmed cases instituted under
the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act has been scuttled as the special
courts meant for the purpose have not yet been set up across the country.
What’s the issue?
The Act provides that the
Central government, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the respective
High Courts, will establish special courts through notification. Such Courts
are to be constituted to ensure that the trials are conducted “as expeditiously
as possible”.
However, the required special
courts have not been set up yet. Therefore, despite the fact that
investigations in almost 100 cases have been completed by the I-T Department in
different States, including confirmation of attachment of properties by the
Adjudicating Authority, the prosecution of accused persons has not started.
About the Benami Act:
The Benami Transactions
(Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016, designed to curb black money and passed by
parliament in August, came into effect on November 1, 2016. The new law amends
the 1988 Benami Transactions Act.
Highlights of the Act:
·
The law provides for up to seven years’
imprisonment and fine for those indulging in such transactions.
·
The law prohibits recovery of the property held Benami
from benamdar by the real owner. As per the Act, properties held Benami are
liable for confiscation by the government, without payment of compensation.
·
An appellate mechanism has been provided under
the act, in the form of an adjudicating authority and appellate tribunal.
·
According to the government, the four authorities
who will conduct inquiries or investigations are the Initiating Officer, Approving
Authority, Administrator and Adjudicating Authority.
What is Benami transaction?
A Benami transaction is one where
a property is held by one person and the amount for it is paid by another
person. Therefore, in a Benami transaction, the name of the person who paid the
money is not mentioned. Directly or indirectly, the Benami transaction is done
to benefit the one who pays.
************************************************************************************************************
This is nothing but knowledge sharing
initiative of author among the professional and not intend to accost any one in
any manner or for any other purpose whatsoever. Source has been taken from the “
The Hindu” Whereas deep care has been taken by author to ensure the correctness
and completeness of the information provided.
************************************************************************************************************
Work with Mr Pedro loans and see the difference in financing because they approved my loan within few days of application after been played several times online then I decided to give a try and work with Mr Pedro on refinancing my business which all went well and smooth than I expected, You can contact him on pedroloanss@gmail.com to obtain your loan at 2% rate.
ReplyDelete